"Wilhelm Reich theorized that without the suppression of sexuality and the imposition of anti-sexual morality, you could not have an authoritarian government, because people would be free from shame, and would trust their own sense of right and wrong. Such people are unlikely to march to war against their wishes, and we would like to think they would be unlikely to agree to operate the death camps too."
-Dossie Easton and Catherine Liszt, The Ethical Slut
I think that speak for everyone from our generation that sex is a topic often brought up among our youths. Christians, Free Thinkers, Buddhists, Muslims, Chinese, Malay, Indians, every bloody one.
It comes to a point when people will think about what kind of positions are the best, when to lose their virginity, whether chastity is an overrated thing, what size are his manhood or her chest, etc. And to make things worse, it's come to a point when sex is viewed as something that HAS to be done to prove one's love to another.
Yes, perhaps I'm exaggerating it, but you have to agree, that wherever you go, you've prob heard a story about that guy or girl that's lost his virginity, gotten pregnant, shotgun marriages. And it doesn't apply only to those who are of this race or religion. It's happening everywhere, to everyone, everytime.
Hang on. This is turning out to be a rant post, so shall stop a while, and think again.
I guess, what I'm trying to say is that though sex is a wonderful thing, it has to be done responsibly, and not done out of lust, or as a deluded form of showing your "love" towards someone.
"Everyone can have sex, but not everyone can handle sex"
- Lilybird
Got that quote from a book me and Casey were reading in the library. It was about premarital sex among teens in America. I think it reflects almost everything that should be imprinted into us humans about sex.
Though our bodies are built for sex, not all our minds are built the same. We all view sex differently, some with fetishes, some who savour chastity, and even some who view it as a definite no-no even in marriage (which I honestly find stupid).
Personally, and I'm not speaking this from a view point of a Muslim, sex is not something that should be flung about like the day's trash. It is something that must be thought of carefully, responsibly, and respectfully. Whenever I think of someone who goes to see a prostitute, I actually feel revulsion towards them. But also, when I think about it carefully, it wasn't just revulsion. I actually feel sorry for them.
They may have to a certain extent fulfilled their sexual desires, but they prob have never done it with someone they truly love, or with someone they truly want to do it with not cos of her hot body or cos of his drop dead looks, but because you want to share a truly magical moment with that special someone.
I've nothing against sex. I just have something against sex which isn't responsible, is done out of lust, and is done without the full consent/trust/etc. of the other.
Sex is truly a wonderful thing, really. Man would prob be very miserable if he couldn't enjoy one of the best things life has to offer. But, if I could make a wish about it, I wish that man were responsible enough to acknowledge that sex is something that must be acted upon with respect, trust, and above all, love.
Personally, regardless of how much I'd want to do it, I would wait till the right time comes. Not just cos of religion (though it does play a big part), because I want to be responsible. I want to make sure that, when it does happen, that it won't be out of lust, and that it'd be a truly magical moment with someone I truly love. Some might ask, why not just do it now, and get it over and done with? To these people, I say: Why bother? You're never gonna enjoy it as much as till the time you've been waiting for comes.
'sides, sex isn't the only way of expressing love. Just remember, whatever it is, intimacy must be coupled with trust, and respect.
Peace...
---
Added on February 19, 2006, by CaseyWhat Azri said above.
Of course, to us, while semantics is sometimes - or, frequently - an annoying trait, in this case, both of us decided to add value to this intimacy, by re-defining and making all the sexual terms separate, not because we are anal, or have too much time, but because we want to always emphasize a respect towards the terms associated with this intimate a gesture.
Having sex.
Fucking.
Making love.
Honestly, there can be no
making love without the trust that you know the other person won't hurt you, or belittle you; there can be no
making love without respect towards the other, and towards the relationship as a whole, viewing the person as a person, and not an object, even in the midst of sexual gratification in the most respectful relationship.
I'm more sexually liberal: I'll admit it straight out. I am not against pre-marital sex, ethics-wise, and beliefs-wise. However, that doesn't mean I go around having sex with every person I'm attracted to. If there's no respect there, sure, you get physical gratification. But what's the value in that? (Of course, you might say it's not for the spiritual value, but hey, I like it. In that case, sure, to each his/her own)
Physiological-wise, Azri and I are both ready for sex (we're not suffering from any retarded growth in our system, thanks, ha-ha); and while, like I said, I'm all right with pre-marital sex, he's not. Does that make our relationship any less valuable?
Your opinion of that is, of course, arbitrary. But for myself, I respect him, and respect his wishes greatly. And though we both desire each other, a promise - a vow - has been made between us, that we will not have sex before marriage, no matter whether it's plain
making love before marriage, or what-not.